Outpatient Application

Day of procedure documentation and patient tracking system

Scroll

Problem

Existing documentation system needed to be updated to remediate technical and UX debt to allow for application scaling and an improved user experience. The entire application was reworked, but for demonstration purposes we’ll focus on the Anesthesia Documentation section.

Process

For this project we wanted to incorporate the user centered design process as much as possible to ensure the end product was something that would have a high acceptance rate. Because this was such a complex application, we solicited user feedback at several different points throughout the design / development process to ensure we were meeting user and customer needs. Here’s what that looked like:

  • User / Stakeholder Interviews to Elicit Requirements

  • Design Workshop

  • Low Fidelity Mockups

  • User Testing

  • Design Iteration / Feedback Incorporation

  • High Fidelity Mockups / Visual Design

  • Cognitive Walkthrough

UX / User Must Haves Based on User and Stakeholder Interviews

  • Responsive Design

  • Intuitive Navigation

  • Fewer Clicks to Task Completion

  • Design / Layout that Closely Mimics Paper Charting

  • Improved Visual Contrast

  • Updated Design

anesthesia+-+flow.jpg

Design Workshop

Requirements from user and stakeholder interviews were identified and marked as a “Must Have,” a “Nice to Have,” or a “Delighter.” These were then used to structure the content of the application and inform overall design.

Navigation was moved from nested tabs across the top to a consistent side panel location.

 

Low Fidelity Mockups / User Testing

Mockups were created based on the design concepts created during the Design Workshop. Using Axure, we created click-through prototypes that were used during our initial round of user testing. Feedback* from these testing sessions was then incorporated into the next design iteration.

*Feedback content has been removed from the image to protect product confidentiality.

Pertinent patient information was identified and made available in a consistent location on all screens.

 
 

Design Iteration and High Fidelity Mockups

Using the feedback gathered in the Low Fidelity User Testing sessions, we collaborated with the Design team to create high fidelity mockups and overall product design guidelines using Adobe Illustrator. Cross-team communication and feedback during the design phase occurred in InVision.

Vitals_1.jpg

Intra—Op Anesthesia Charting: A top priority for users was for the electronic chart for anesthesia to look as close to paper charting as possible while improving the overall user experience.

Pre-Op Medications: Charting of patients current medications and the last time they were taken or administered.

Provider Desktop Dual View: It was important to users to be able to see both a schedule that they could navigate as well as view of today’s patients and where they were in the perioperative workflow on the same screen.

Provider Desktop Expanded: In order to allow users to view as much information as possible for each of those sections, we added the ability to expand and collapse the Schedule and Today’s Patients sections independently.

Cognitive Walkthrough

Using both the high fidelity mockups as well as an early working build, we tested the application with a cross section of medical professionals familiar with Anesthesia charting, the previous application, and other medical documentation systems. We conducted a cognitive walkthrough and assessed things such as:

  • Time on Task

  • Task Completion Rate

  • False Clicks

  • Satisfaction Ratings

While we did find some areas of the application that still needed improvement, overall satisfaction was high. All items that did not meet their designated “pass” threshold were submitted back to the team for further consideration and future incorporation into the application.

Screen Shot 2020-11-09 at 3.22.08 PM.png
Next
Next

Devices and Physicians